Cite this article as:

Pikalova E. V. Morphometry and seed productivity of some representatives of the Lamiaceae family of a plot of medicinal plants of the Botanical Garden of the Orеnburg State University. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Chemistry. Biology. Ecology, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 1, pp. 74-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9775-2022-22-1-74-81


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
581.4/58.006/58.084
Language: 
Russian

Morphometry and seed productivity of some representatives of the Lamiaceae family of a plot of medicinal plants of the Botanical Garden of the Orеnburg State University

Тип статьи для РИНЦ: 
RAR научная статья
Abstract

Data on the study of morphometric parameters of medicinal plants such as Hyssopus offi cinalis L. and Nepeta pannonica L., which are part of the collection of medicinal plants of the Botanical Garden of the Orеnburg State University, are presented. It was found that the studied species successfully adapt to new growing conditions, since the parameters of morphometry vary within the medium to very high levels of variability. However, Nepeta pannonica L. is more plastic, since the values of the coeffi cients of variation of traits in this species are higher than in Hyssopus offi cinalis L. Comparison of the parameters of plants in 2019 with plants in 2020 showed that the highest values for both Hyssopus offi cinalis L. and Nepeta pannonica L. were recorded in 2020. The study of reproductive indicators also showed their dependence on the weather conditions of each specifi c year of research: the more favorable the climatic features of the year, the higher the seed productivity. Thus, for Hyssopus offi cinalis L., the maximum number of seeds per plant was 328.4 pcs. (2020) and the minimum was 278. 3 pcs. (2021); for Nepeta pannonica L. the maximum number of seeds was 412.3 pcs. per plant (2020) and the minimum was 334.6 pcs. (2021).

References
  1. Andreeva I. Z., Abramova L. M. Evaluation of the success of the introduction of medicinal plants in the South Ural Botanical Garden. Vestnik Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronik Scientifi c Journal, 2018, no. 2(26), pp. 1–11 (in Russian). Available at: http://vestospu.ru/archive/2018/articles/1_26_2018.pdf (accessed 8 February 2021). https://doi.org/10.32516/2303-9922.2018.26.1
  2. Vasfi lova E. S., Vorob’eva T. A. Lekarstvennye i pryanoaromaticheskie rasteniya v usloviyah introdukcii na Srednem Urale [Medicinal and spicy-aromatic plants under conditions of introduction in the Middle Urals]. Ekaterinburg, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011. 245 p. (in Russian).
  3. Vronskaya O. O. Results of the primary introduction of species of the family Lamiaceae LINDL. (Yasnotkovye) in the Kuzbass Botanical Garden. Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University, 2017, no. 11, pp. 96–99 (in Russian).
  4. Gubanov A. G. Collection study of medicinal plant species in the Northern Trans-Urals, issues of introduction and acclimatization. Advances in Current Natural Science, 2016, no. 12-1, pp. 74–78 (in Russian).
  5. Skvortsov A. K. Plant introduction and botanical gardens: Refl ections on the past, present and future. Bulletin Main Botanical Garden, 1996, iss. 173, pp. 4–16 (in Russian).
  6. Gendov V., Ciocarlan N., Danila D. Bio-ecologigal reculiarities of Nepeta pannonica L. under in situ and ex situ conditions. Journal of Botany, 2015, vol. VII, no. 2 (11), pp. 35–39.
  7. Tahir M., Khushtar M., Fahad M., Rahman Md. A. Phytochemistry and pharmacological profile of traditionally used medicinal plant Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis L.). Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 2018, vol. 8 (07), pp. 132–140.
  8. Kalinichenko L. V., Malankina E. L., Kozlovskaya L. N. Comparative assessment of the productivity of the medicinal hyssop (Hyssopus offi cinalis L.) depending on the variety and origin of the sample. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 2013, iss. 5, pp. 171–175 (in Russian).
  9. Gusejnova Z. A., Kuramagomedov M. K. Comparative assessment of the variability of morphological characters of some species of the genus Nepeta L. during introduction in the mountainous conditions of Dagestan. Bulletin of the Samara University. Natural Science Series, 2017, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 65–70 (in Russian).
  10. Gusev N. F. Lekarstvennye rasteniya Orenburzh’ya (resursy, vyrashchivanie i ispol’zovanie) [Medicinal plants of the Orenburg region (resources, cultivation and use)]. Orenburg, Izd. Centr OGAU, 2007. 330 p. (in Russian).
  11. Varlygina T. I., Zubakin V. A., Sobolev N. A. Krasnaya kniga Moskovskoi oblasti [The Red Book of the Moscow Region]. Moscow, T-vo nauch. izd. KMK, 2008. 828 p. (in Russian).
  12. Golubev V. N. Fundamentals of biomorphology of herbaceous plants in the central forest-steppe. Tr. Central’nochernozemnogo zapovednika im. V. V. Alekhina [Tr. Central Chernozem Reserve named after V. V. Alekhin]. Voronezh, Izd-vo Voronezhskogo un-ta, 1962, iss. 7. 602 p. (in Russian).
  13. Vajnagij I. V. On the method of studying seed productivity of plants. Botanicheskii Zhurnal, 1974, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 826–831 (in Russian).
  14. GOST 12042-80. Agricultural seeds. Methods for determining the mass of 1000 seeds. Introduction. 07/01/1981. Moscow, Izd-vo standartov, 1981. 118 p. (in Russian).
  15. Zaitsev G. N. Matematicheskaya statistika v eksperimental’noy botanike [Mathematical Statistics in Experimental Botany]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984. 424 p. (in Russian).
  16. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoj obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovanij). 5-e izd., dop. i pererab. [Field experiment methodology (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). 5th ed., add. and revised]. Moscow, Agroprom izdat Publ., 1985. 351 p. (in Russian)
  17. Mamaev S. A. Formy vnutrividovoj izmenchivosti drevesnyh rasteniy [Forms of intraspecifi c variability of woody plants]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1972. 276 p. (in Russian).
  18. Chernyavskikh V. I. Breeding and seed production of medicinal hyssop (Hyssopus offi cinalis L.) in the Central Black Earth region. Taurida Herald of Agrarian Sciences, 2018, no. 3 (15), pp. 137–146 (in Russian). 
Full text (in Russian):