Cite this article as:
Kulevatova T. B., Zlobina L. N., Beketova G. A., Starichkova N. I. Impact of the Predator on Quality Indicators Grain of Soft Wheat. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Chemistry. Biology. Ecology, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 64-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9775-2019-19-1-64-69
Impact of the Predator on Quality Indicators Grain of Soft Wheat
The aim of this study was to identify the effect of precursor (vapor, winter wheat) on the non-traditional selective grain quality parameter intensity of spring common wheat. The parameters include dough development time, dough stability, energy absorbed by dough while kneading and starch retrogradation coefficient. The data have been obtained using a Mixolab device. The objects of the study were 12 varieties of spring soft wheat grown in the nursery of the main competition testing laboratory of selection and seed breeding of spring soft wheat of FSBI “research Institute of the South-East”: Saratovskaya 29, Saratovskaya 55, Saratovskaya 58, Prokhorov a, Lutescens 62, Saratovskaya 60, Favorit, Saratovskaya 42, Saratovskaya 70 Saratovskaya 74, 73 Saratov, Saratov 68, of the 3 crop years: 2012, 2013, 2014 GGG. The rheological curves of dough for all samples have been obtained. The quantitative severity and variability of nontraditional grain quality features are shown. The varietal variation according to the studied quality criteria is revealed, the relationship between single-name indices in varietal samples grown on a pair and winter wheat and between non-traditional indicators within each year. Seasonal effects based on genotypic correlation co-efficient for all studied grain quality parameters of spring common wheat have been shown. According to both predecessors, there is a lack of interaction between genotype environment in terms of R5, C5.
1. Bebyakin V. M. K vyboru prioritetov v selekcii pshenicy na kachestvo [To selection of priorities in wheat breeding for quality]. In: Adaptivnye tekhnologii proizvodstva kachestvennogo zerna v zasushlivom Povolzh’e [Adaptive technologies of high-quality grain production in the arid Volga region]. Saratov, New Wind Publ., 2004, pp. 195–197 (in Russian).
2. Pryanishnikov A. I., Savchenko I. V., El’konin L. A., Lyashcheva S. V., Kulevatova T. B. Prioritety adaptivnoj selekcii [The priorities of adaptive selection]. Prodovol’stvennaya bezopasnost’ sel’skogo hozyajstva Rossii v XXI veke. Zhuchenkovskie chteniya II: sb. nauch. tr. [Food security of agriculture in Russia in the XXI century. Zhuchenko reading II: collection of scientifi c papers, iss. 11(59). FSBI “Research Institute of feed them. W. R. Williams”]. Moscow, LLC “Ugresh printing house”, 2016, pp. 195–201 (in Russian).
3. Kulevatova T. B., Andreyeva L.V. , Zlobina L. N. Novye metodicheskie podhody k ocenke kachestva zerna [New methodological approaches to the assessment of grain quality]. Sovremennye metody, sredstva i normativy v oblasti ocenki kachestva zerna i zernoproduktov [Modern methods, tools and standards in the fi eld of quality assessment of grain and grain products. Sb. Materials 13th All-Russian scientifi c-practical conference (Anapa, 6–10 June 2016). CF FGBI “ARRIAH”]. Anapa, 2016, pp. 89–96 (in Russian).
4. GOST ISO 17718-2015. Zerno i muka iz myagkoj pshenicy. Opredelenie reologicheskih svojstv testa v zavisimosti ot uslovij zamesa i povysheniya temperatury [Grain and fl our from soft wheat. Determination of rheological properties of the dough depending on the mixing conditions and temperature ris]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2016, p. 28 (in Russian).
5. Duyba A., Rysev K. Sovremennyj metod kontrolya kachestva zerna i muki po reologicheskim svojstvam testa, opredelyaemym s pomoshch’yu miksolab profajler [Modern method of quality control of grain and fl our on the rheological properties of the dough, determined by means of mixolab Profi ler]. Materialy I nauch.-prakt. konf. i vystavki s mezhdunar. uchastiem “Upravlenie reologicheskimi svojstvami pishchevyh produktov” [Materials of the I Scientifi c-practical conference and exhibition with international participation “management of theological properties of food products” (Moscow, 25–26 September 2008)]. Moscow, MGUPP, 2008, pp. 86–95 (in Russian).
